Nashville SC

MLS Power Ratings: Matchdate 12

See some notes from Matchdate Six ratings to explain what goes into the numbers.

  • Yes, I’m aware that the ratings don’t match what the MLS Standings say. If you’re curious about those, visit major league soccer soccer dot com.
  • Game data comes from American Soccer Analysis‘s outstanding web app. You can see the full table here.
MD12TeamPOWER XGPOWER GHFA xGOffense xGDefense xG“Luck”
↔︎1Los Angeles Football Club1.841.060.521.16-0.68-0.78
↑52Seattle Sounders0.640.740.200.20-0.440.10
↔︎3New York Red Bulls0.48-0.59-0.35-0.01-0.49-1.07
↑44Columbus Crew0.420.260.520.12-0.30-0.16
↓15San Jose Earthquakes0.40-0.121.820.29-0.11-0.52
↔︎6Fußball Club Cincinnati0.370.45-0.600.380.010.09
↓27Minnesota United FC0.31-0.26-0.780.15-0.16-0.57
↓68Vancouver Whitecaps FC0.26-
↑59New York City FC0.190.100.19-0.03-0.23-0.09
↓110Nashville SC0.180.440.06-0.27-0.460.25
↑111Colorado Rapids0.15-0.310.82-0.09-0.25-0.46
↑112Los Angeles Galaxy0.15-0.810.850.480.33-0.95
↓313Philadelphia Union0.100.060.900.250.15-0.03
↑214New England Revolution0.010.56-0.200.400.390.55
↔︎15Toronto FC-
↑116Chicago Fire-0.08-0.34-0.630.020.10-0.27
↓617Atlanta United FC-
↑118FC Dallas-0.100.10-1.52-
↑219Sporting Kansas City-0.17-0.38-0.36-0.43-0.26-0.22
↑320Orlando City SC-0.25-
↑121St. Louis City SC-0.270.42-0.550.010.280.70
↑222Portland Timbers FC-0.350.23-0.34-
↓323Austin FC-0.36-0.63-0.94-0.290.07-0.26
↓624Houston Dynamo-0.420.00-
↔︎25DC United-0.460.09-0.57-
↔︎26Real Salt Lake-0.55-0.440.05-0.260.300.11
↑127Montreal Impact-0.690.001.15-0.560.130.69
↑128Charlotte FC-0.70-0.510.95-0.300.400.19
↓229Inter Miami CF-0.79-0.04-1.32-0.530.250.74

Some thoughts:

  • Welcome to the bottom, Inter Miami. As you can see, the bottom of the xG-sorted (imo, more meaningful) table has a couple teams who don’t look particularly bad to the actual goals scored, namely IMCF and CF Montreal. All clubs de foot are lucky dogs. Meanwhile, Charlotte FC and RSL both suck in a predictive sense and an actual one.
  • LAFC continues to lap the field at the top on the other hand. Numbers are much closer when it comes to actual goals, but being a team that is already the best and chooses to keep the pedal down even when leading will give you some exciting numbers.
  • That brings me to the other key point – that I typically restate in this section each week – that the “luck” factor includes both luck in a traditional sense, and goalkeeping quality for and against… but game state remains a major piece of that. Teams that stake themselves out to leads and then successfully defend (other than this week, that’s been Nashville, for example) are going to be a little deflated in the xG numbers.
  • Red Bulls have been so bad in the table that they fired a coach (also maybe because he was complicit in A Racism)… but the xG numbers haven’t been bad and the bounceback basically felt inevitable, and it’s going to make Struber look particularly bad and Troy Lesesne particularly good, when that’s really mostly statistical noise.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: